Jaime Tadeo is a known leader of the peasant movement. He led the march to Mendiola in January 22, 1987 that ended up in what is now known as the Mendiola Massacre.
Interviewer: Joel F. Ariate Jr.
Videographer: Alleson D. Villota
Date of Interview: June 5, 2008
Place: Quezon City
Jimmy Tadeo went to Mendiola bridge that day intent on fomenting a confrontation with Malacanang security. On the way there he granted interviews where he colorfully and vehmently warned that "dadanak ang dugo" (rivers of blood will flow). Perhaps he didn't expect the literal outcome but it was very irresponsible of him to urge the farmers on and surge towards the bridge.
The government was less than a year old, still highly unstable, and though a part of the officer's corps were loyal to the constitution, the rank and file were the same rank and file of Marcos's army. To expect them to suddenly change their outlook is wishful thinking. The soldiers on the bridge may be following military discipline but once the protesters surged, adrenalin took over and instinct ruled. And yes, to the Marcos soldier, protesting peasant farmers are 'enemies' and when the enemy comes after you, you shoot. Only one bullet shot in panic is enough to trigger a volley of shots.
The Aquino administration might have been remiss in not monitoring the farmer's protest more closely but this tragedy is mostly Tadeo's fault. He has the blood of those thirteen fallen peasants on his hands.
Both the left and the right have their share of political opportunists. That day in Mendiola, we saw one who miscalculated in his opportunism then turned around and fled as the people he led to slaughter fell.
All Cory's fault. She made high-flying promises to right the fallen dictator's wrongs but performed worse in the end. The blood of these dead farmers is in her hands because she was the military's commander-in-chief. She could have ordered her men not to shoot.
This blog is one of the sites that makes available to the public the collection of interviews conducted by the researchers of the UP Third World Studies Center, led by Joel F. Ariate Jr., for the "Mendiola Narratives" research project (please click here for the other site). The research was funded by the South-South Exchange Programme for Research on the History of Development of the International Institute of Social History. In this research, a site biography and a collection of narratives of social movement actors serve as the infrastructure of social memory. The research surfaces and records in audiovisual format the personal narratives of those who were once witnesses and participants to protest actions in Mendiola. Mendiola is the name of the main street that leads directly to the MalacaƱang Palace, the seat of the Philippine presidency. Since the 1950s, Mendiola has been the foremost site of physical confrontation between social movement actors waging protests and the state. Generations of social movement actors have braved bullets and barricades in the street of Mendiola just to be able to put forward their grievances within shouting distance of the Philippine president. Mendiola then is a palimpsest on which many stories and deeds of activism, of the Filipinos untiring quest for justice, have been inscribed—some of which in blood. It is the task of the research, and of this site, to encourage social movement actors to articulate their stories of Mendiola. This research makes visible their refusal to forget the injustices suffered by the Filipinos at the hand of their own government and the resolute stance that the Filipinos have taken to speak truth to power.
Jimmy Tadeo went to Mendiola bridge that day intent on fomenting a confrontation with Malacanang security. On the way there he granted interviews where he colorfully and vehmently warned that "dadanak ang dugo" (rivers of blood will flow). Perhaps he didn't expect the literal outcome but it was very irresponsible of him to urge the farmers on and surge towards the bridge.
ReplyDeleteThe government was less than a year old, still highly unstable, and though a part of the officer's corps were loyal to the constitution, the rank and file were the same rank and file of Marcos's army. To expect them to suddenly change their outlook is wishful thinking. The soldiers on the bridge may be following military discipline but once the protesters surged, adrenalin took over and instinct ruled. And yes, to the Marcos soldier, protesting peasant farmers are 'enemies' and when the enemy comes after you, you shoot. Only one bullet shot in panic is enough to trigger a volley of shots.
The Aquino administration might have been remiss in not monitoring the farmer's protest more closely but this tragedy is mostly Tadeo's fault. He has the blood of those thirteen fallen peasants on his hands.
Both the left and the right have their share of political opportunists. That day in Mendiola, we saw one who miscalculated in his opportunism then turned around and fled as the people he led to slaughter fell.
All Cory's fault. She made high-flying promises to right the fallen dictator's wrongs but performed worse in the end. The blood of these dead farmers is in her hands because she was the military's commander-in-chief. She could have ordered her men not to shoot.
ReplyDelete